Shrader v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that basis of holding in Sparkman was that detective’s statements were “blatantly prejudicial”
• recognizing that basis of holding in Sparkman was that detective’s statements were “blatantly prejudicial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eugene v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-26· cited 26×
• Derival v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-06· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Pausch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-08· cited 17×
• State v. Ramos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-15· cited 16×
• Sparkman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-18· cited 10×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-24· cited 6×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-12· cited 1×