· 12/31/1969
Shoberg v. Kelly
Citations
- 463 P.2d 280
- 1 Wash. App. 673
- 1969 Wash. App. LEXIS 388
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- medical expert was necessary and an affidavit of counsel “was not a substitute for expert medical testimony”
- medical expert was necessary and an affidavit of counsel \was not a substitute for expert medical testimony.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horowitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.