Turner v. Kohler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in hearing summary judgment motion based on evidence when party’s summary judgment affidavits did not mention CR 56(f), request a continuance, state what evidence was contemplated, or state reason for delay
• affirming denial of a continuance where the party’s summary judgment affidavits did not explicitly request a continuance, reference CR 56(f), or state the reason for delay
• citing, Lewis v. Bell, 45 Wash.App. 192, 196, 724 P.2d 425 (1986)
• trial court acted properly in hearing the motion on the basis of the showing before it
• denial of request for continuance proper where affidavit did not mention CR 56(f), explicitly request a continuance, nor state the reason for delay
• trial court acted properly in hearing the motion on the basis of the showing before it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).