Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/1/1982

Shivers v. Amerco

Citations

  • 670 F.2d 826

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to decide whether conduct violated section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 on finding that plaintiffs lacked standing
  • stating that “[t]he blue sky laws of . . . Nevada . . . parallel Rule 10b-5 .... Since . . . Nevada . . . chose to enact laws paralleling Rule 10b-5, we think it only logical that [Nevada] intended the statutes to be interpreted consistently with the federal rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.