Secretary of State v. Tretiak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that scienter is not a required element of a cause of action under NRS 90.570 for securities fraud
• providing that scienter is not a required element of a cause of action under NRS 90.570 for securities fraud
• concluding the equivalents of HRS §§ 485-25(a)(2) and (a)(3) do not require scienter in an agency enforcement action, based on plain language analysis and in keeping with other state courts and Aaron
• concluding the equivalents of HRS §§ 485-25(a)(2) and (a)(3) do not require scienter in an agency enforcement action, based on plain language analysis and in keeping with other state courts and Aaron
• relying on federal securities law to hold that reliance and scienter are not required elements in an NRS 90.570(2) state-enforcement action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).