Skip to main content

Shifflett v. State

Citations

  • 554 A.2d 814
  • 315 Md. 382
  • 1989 Md. LEXIS 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding reason for allocution is to improve truth-finding process by considering comments from defendant's perspective
  • holding reason for allocution is to improve truth-finding process by considering comments from defendant’s perspective
  • requiring as part of right to allocution that defendant be allowed \to respond to the new substantive remarks of the prosecutor\
  • “the raison d’etre of allocution as it exists in Maryland is to improve the truth-finding process by considering comments from the defendant’s perspective”
  • “The ability to speak in mitigation of punishment under the circumstances of this case necessarily entailed the opportunity to respond to the new substantive remarks of the prosecutor.”
  • \The ability to speak in mitigation of punishment under the circumstances of this case necessarily entailed the opportunity to respond to the new substantive remarks of the prosecutor.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell, McAuliffe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.