Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/15/1989
Shifflett v. State
Citations
- 554 A.2d 814
- 315 Md. 382
- 1989 Md. LEXIS 42
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding reason for allocution is to improve truth-finding process by considering comments from defendant's perspective
- holding reason for allocution is to improve truth-finding process by considering comments from defendant’s perspective
- requiring as part of right to allocution that defendant be allowed \to respond to the new substantive remarks of the prosecutor\
- “the raison d’etre of allocution as it exists in Maryland is to improve the truth-finding process by considering comments from the defendant’s perspective”
- “The ability to speak in mitigation of punishment under the circumstances of this case necessarily entailed the opportunity to respond to the new substantive remarks of the prosecutor.”
- \The ability to speak in mitigation of punishment under the circumstances of this case necessarily entailed the opportunity to respond to the new substantive remarks of the prosecutor.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackwell, McAuliffe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2018-03-22· cited 113×
- Shelton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-01-05· cited 90×
- Thanos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-05· cited 64×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-09· cited 26×
- Clermont v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-20· cited 20×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,501×
- Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-11· cited 117×
- State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-25· cited 87×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-05· cited 74×
- Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-15· cited 70×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-23· cited 57×
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-02-10· cited 32×
- Kent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-04-08· cited 31×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.