Shields v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court properly denied motion to suppress defendant’s statement following question about whether he understood his rights, which was “a routine and appropriate inquiry and we cannot conclude that it constituted interrogation” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shields v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-06-02· cited 23×
• Caldwell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-05-16· cited 6×
• Hill v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-11-19· cited 5×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-31· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• Dennard v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 55×
• Walton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-03-17· cited 51×
• Kidwell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-07-05· cited 20×
• Allen v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1989-03-13· cited 17×
• Daughenbaugh v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-02-28· cited 8×