Sherry Ann Sullivan v. Central Intelligence Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts may \look behind statutory language\ when the legislature \blows an uncertain trumpet\
• noting that \Congress carefully carved out [these] three areas\ in recognition of the potentially \highly informative\ nature of certain operational files
• explaining ___ that courts may \look behind statutory language\ when the legislature \blows an uncertain trumpet\
• noting the power of ___ courts to \look behind statutory language\ when the legislature \blow[s] an uncertain trumpet\
• observing exception when an absurd or legally unacceptable result would otherwise obtain
• observing exception when an absurd or legally unacceptable result would otherwise obtain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).