South Dakota Supreme Court· 5/10/1910
Sherman v. State
Citations
- 25 S.D. 369
- 126 N.W. 611
- 1910 S.D. LEXIS 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Constitutions are supposed to be prepared with much care and deliberation. It will not do to assume that such important instruments contain any idle or meaningless phrases.”
- “Constitutions are supposed to be prepared with much care -54- #25330, #25333 and deliberation. It will not do to assume that such important instruments contain any idle or meaningless phrases.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haney, Whiting
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hunt v. CallaghanArizona Supreme Court· 1927-06-22· cited 41×
- Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Old Dominion Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1927-02-21· cited 23×
- State v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court· 1919-06-18· cited 20×
- Sherman v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1911-02-23· cited 20×
- Davis v. Ssd Dept. of Ed.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-08-31· cited 18×
- Peterson Oil Co. v. FrarySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1923-02-24· cited 14×
- Friessen Const. Co., Inc. v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-01-15· cited 11×
- Stene v. School Board of Beresford Ind. School Dist., No. 68South Dakota Supreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 9×
- Strauss v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1917-04-04· cited 3×
- Blodgett v. HoldenW.D. Michigan· 1926-02-17· cited 3×
- Advisory OpinionSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2026-02-18· cited 1×
- State v. WarkenthienSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1937-03-15
- State v. AlbaidhaniSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2026-04-22
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court· 1900-05-14· cited 739×
- United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 241×
- Gelsthorpe v. FurnellMontana Supreme Court· 1897-11-15· cited 61×
- Eyre v. JacobSupreme Court of Virginia· 1858-05-24· cited 58×
- Kochersperger v. DrakeIllinois Supreme Court· 1897-05-11· cited 52×
- In re the Estate of WilmerdingCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-06-17· cited 48×
- In re WatsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1903-12-09· cited 39×
- In re Hickok's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont· 1906-01-26· cited 38×
- Grim v. Weissenberg School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1868-03-23· cited 33×
- State ex rel. Foot v. BazilleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1905-12-29· cited 30×
- Crawford v. Linn CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1884-10-15· cited 29×
- In re Fox's EstateMichigan Supreme Court· 1908-09-10· cited 29×
- Drew v. TifftSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1900-02-14· cited 15×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Dysart v. M'WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1849-05-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.