In re Watson
Citations
- 17 S.D. 486
- 97 N.W. 463
- 1903 S.D. LEXIS 81
Syllabus
<p>1. There are no limitations on the power of the Legislature except such as are imposed by the state and federal Constitutions, and no legislative act should be declared unconstitutional unless it palpably conflicts with some principal of constitutional law.</p> <p>2. Const, art. 11, § 2, declaring that all taxes shall be uniform on all real and personal property according to its value in money, to be ascertained by rules prescribed by'general law, when construed with article 6, § 17, requiring that all taxation shall be equal and uniform, and article 11, § 3, declaring that the power to tax corporations and corporate property shall not be surrendered, requires all property not expressly exempted by the Constitution to be taxed according to its value, but does not by implication preclude other methods of taxation, such as taxes on occupations.</p> <p>3. Const, art. 6, § 17, declaring that all taxation shall be equal and uniform, means, with reference to taxes on occupations, that the taxes imposed shall fall alike on all persons who are in substantially the same situation; and' therefore the Legislature may classify occupations for the purpose of taxation, and tax some and exempt others.</p> <p>4. Laws 1903, p. 249, c. 190, imposing a license on peddlers dealing in goods, wares or merchandise, “except nursery stock, agricultural products, including milk, butter, eggs, and cheese,” and providing that the act shall riot apply to traveling salesmen doing business, with retailers or with public officers, if construed as imposing a tax on occupations under the taxing power, imposes a tax on all persons embraced within a class, based on a classification conforming to natural and well-recognized lines of distinction, and is therefore not in conflict with article 6, § 17, declaring that all taxation shall be equal and uniform.</p> <p>5. The statute if considered as an exercise of the police power of the state, is not in conflict with Const, art. 6, Sec. 18 providing that
Judges: Haney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1916-02-05· cited 113×
- Behrns v. BurkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1975-04-25· cited 62×
- Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1968-07-16· cited 53×
- State ex rel. Payne v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1921-10-27· cited 50×
- Ferguson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-12-17· cited 47×
- State ex rel. Wagner v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1913-12-30· cited 42×
- Salt Lake City v. Christensen Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1908-04-14· cited 42×
- Sims v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1925-01-19· cited 40×
- Jackson v. NeffSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 39×
- Wyatt v. KundertSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-10-02· cited 34×
- Sherman v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1910-05-10· cited 27×
- H. L. Carpel of Richmond, Inc. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia· 1934-06-14· cited 21×
- Sherman v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1911-02-23· cited 20×
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1964-07-01· cited 18×
- Queen City Fire Ins. v. BasfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1911-02-23· cited 15×
- O'Leary v. CroghanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1919-08-15· cited 15×
- Peterson Oil Co. v. FrarySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1923-02-24· cited 14×
- Friessen Const. Co., Inc. v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-01-15· cited 11×
- City of Sedalia Ex Rel. Bauman v. Standard Oil Co. of IndianaEighth Circuit· 1933-08-03· cited 10×
- First National Bank of Frankfort v. HalsteadSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1930-02-21· cited 8×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1892-04-05· cited 86×
- Lasher v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1899-12-18· cited 39×
- Fleetwood v. ReadWashington Supreme Court· 1899-10-13· cited 36×
- Grim v. Weissenberg School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1868-03-23· cited 33×
- State v. ChurchSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1894-10-06· cited 20×
- State v. MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1892-08-17· cited 17×
- Bon Homme County v. BerndtSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-04-01· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.