Skip to main content
First Circuit· 4/21/2010

Sherman v. Potapov

Citations

  • 603 F.3d 11
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8226
  • 53 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1
  • 2010 WL 1582563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 23, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999), and quoting United States v. Young, 955 F.2d 99, 102 (1st Cir. 1992)
  • relying on Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 23, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999), and quoting United States v. Young, 955 F.2d 99, 102 (1st Cir. 1992)
  • affirming determination that corporate principal engaged in embezzlement where he participated in a rebilling maneuver, appropriating client funds to keep the corporate doors open, to his own benefit, and without authority from the affected clients
  • defining embezzlement as used in § 523(a)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Souter, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Sherman v. Potapov

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.