Skip to main content
· 1/28/1992

United States v. Howard W. Young

Citations

  • 955 F.2d 99
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1010
  • 1992 WL 11208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the “intent to return” defense is not a defense to embezzlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Coffin, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.