Sheriff, Clark County v. Blasko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of information received by police is not hearsay when offered to explain why they were watching the van in which defendant was found
• testimony explaining the reasons for police surveillance is not hearsay, because not offered for the truth of the matter asserted
• testimony explaining the reasons for police surveillance is not hearsay, because not offered for the truth of the matter asserted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barton v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2001-09-12· cited 32×
• State v. Connery
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1983-04-29· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Darden
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-11· cited 25×
• State v. Eighth Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1984-02-06· cited 9×
• Myatt v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1985-12-20· cited 3×
• COLLINS (LESEAN) VS. STATE
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2017-11-22

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simpson v. Eighth Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 47×
• Sheriff, Clark County v. Provenza
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-07-02· cited 30×
• Warden, Nevada State Prison v. Peters
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1967-06-22· cited 28×
• Ross v. Giacomo
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-10-29· cited 27×
• Lane v. Torvinen
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-03-19· cited 9×