Shepard v. Temple University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Failure of a non-moving party to adduce sufficient evidence on an issue essential to his case and on 5 ARSC also pled a unjust enrichment as a quasi-contract theory of recovery. See Amended Complaint, 7/29/15, 7-9 (count III

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-22· cited 116×
• Betz v. Erie Insurance Exchange
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-22· cited 66×
• Babb v. Centre Community Hospital
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-06-14· cited 40×
• ADP, INC. v. Morrow Motors Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-26· cited 32×
• Today's Housing v. Times Shamrock Communications, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-04· cited 26×
• Alexander v. City of Meadville
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-12-07· cited 26×
• Gubbiotti v. Santey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-06-26· cited 16×
• Longwell v. Giordano
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-11-08· cited 7×
• LHR, INC. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-12-27· cited 1×
• Warnick v. All Saints Episcopal Church
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2014-04-15
• Caucci v. Chelsea Pocono Holdings LLC
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-06-23

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy Ghost
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-17· cited 387×
• Baker v. Lafayette College
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-15· cited 119×
• Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-30· cited 115×
• Baker v. Lafayette College
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-28· cited 77×