ADP, INC. v. Morrow Motors Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that, as a result, our summary judgment scope and standard of review applied to the matter before it
• stating that “an agreement that prohibits non-written modification may be modified by [a] subsequent oral agreement if the parties’ conduct clearly shows the intent to waive the requirement that the amendments be made in writing”
• applying the forum state’s substantive law where neither party raised a choice-of-law issue or alleged a substantive difference between the laws of the forum state and the laws of the state which the parties chose to govern their “master service agreement”
• applying the forum state’s substantive law where neither party raised a choice-of-law issue or alleged a substantive difference between the laws of the forum state and the laws of the state which the parties chose to govern their “master service agreement”
• applying the forum state’s substantive law where neither party raised a choice-of-law issue or alleged a substantive difference between the laws of the forum state and the laws of the state which the parties chose to govern their “master service agreement”
• involving auto dealership contract for computer software/equipment and services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).