Shepard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that the corroboration requirement contained in the solicitation statute requires that “we eliminate the minor victim’s testimony from consideration and then determine whether there is other incriminating evidence tending to connect the accused with the crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Erasmo Leyva, Jr. v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-07-25· cited 15×
• Kaliscia Elonda Millsap v. State
  Texas Supreme Court· 2017-06-23
• Melvin Douglas Waldrop v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2026-05-01

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Clewis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-31· cited 5,788×
• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 3,060×
• Moreno v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-29· cited 1,851×
• McFarland v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-02-21· cited 1,746×
• Chambers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-27· cited 1,350×
• Ingham v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-10-17· cited 684×
• McKinney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-15· cited 223×
• Richardson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-09· cited 59×
• Kmiec v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-10-24· cited 15×