Skip to main content
· 5/15/2006

Shepard v. Schurz Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 847 N.E.2d 219
  • 35 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1091
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 864
  • 2006 WL 1312962

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Trial Rule 56(C) summary-judgment standard applies to motions to dismiss filed pursuant to the anti-SLAPP statute
  • acknowledging a conflict between the burden of proof in the Anti-SLAPP statute and Trial Rule 56 and concluding that the conflict must be resolved in favor of the statute
  • acknowledging a conflict between the burden of proof in the Anti-SLAPP statute and Trial Rule 56 and concluding that the conflict must be resolved in favor of the statute
  • “We may affirm the grant of summary judgment upon any basis argued by the parties and supported by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Kirsch, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.