Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. Franklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, where no equitable estoppel claim was raised, that nonsignatory could not bind signatory to arbitration agreement when there was no showing nonsignatory was in privity with a signatory or was a third-party beneficiary of the agreement
• “[T]he reasonableness of attorney’s fees is a matter regarding which the judge, being a lawyer, may take judicial notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).