Shell Oil Co. v. Diehl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “appellee introduced no evidence that the security precautions which were being employed on appellants’ business premises did not comply with the standard of care” or were otherwise unreasonable
• “The proprietor of a business has a duty, when he can reasonably apprehend danger to a customer from the misconduct of [others] to exercise ordinary care to protect the customer....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).