Skip to main content
· 9/23/1975

Lay v. Munford, Inc.

Citations

  • 219 S.E.2d 416
  • 235 Ga. 340
  • 1975 Ga. LEXIS 873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing grant of summary judgment where defendant was “aware” that an armed robbery might occur because the convenience store had been the “scene of numerous armed robberies” and had hired a stakeout unit as a result
  • “The question of reasonable foreseeability and the statutory duty imposed by [the predecessor to OCGA § 51-3-1], to exercise ordinary care to protect the plaintiff in the circumstances of this case, is for a jury’s determination rather than summary adjudication by the courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nichols, Gunter, Undercofler, Jordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.