Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/29/1968
Sheehy v. Sheehy
Citations
- 242 A.2d 153
- 250 Md. 181
- 1968 Md. LEXIS 715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[T]he fact that the defendant may have had actual knowledge of the suit against him would not cure a defective service.\
- “[i]f the defendant was not properly served the court below had no jurisdiction____ To have been valid the service must have been personal and the fact that the defendant may have had actual knowledge of the suit against him would not cure a defective service.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hammond, Horney, Marbury, Barnes, McWilliams, Finan, Singley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pickett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-13· cited 59×
- Lohman v. LohmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-25· cited 26×
- Miles v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-10-05· cited 25×
- Leichtman v. KoonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-06-29· cited 24×
- State Highway Administration v. KeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-05-26· cited 19×
- Mooring v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-14· cited 18×
- Reed v. SweeneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-03-11· cited 14×
- Guen v. GuenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-17· cited 12×
- Jardine, Gill & Duffus, Inc. v. M/V CASSIOPEIAD. Maryland· 1981-09-25· cited 10×
- LVI Environmental Services, Inc. v. Academy of IRMCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-02· cited 10×
- Trademark Remodeling, Inc. v. RhinesD. Maryland· 2012-03-30· cited 9×
- Steed Mortgage Co. v. ArthurCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-18· cited 8×
- J. Whitson Rogers, Inc. v. HanleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-05-24· cited 7×
- Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander v. GerholdCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-05· cited 6×
- Roddy-Duncan v. DuncanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-06-02· cited 1×
- (1997)Maryland Attorney General Reports· 1997-08-21
- Surasky v. SuraskyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-03
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.