Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/19/1983
Shea v. State
Citations
- 310 S.E.2d 819
- 279 S.C. 604
- 1983 S.C. App. LEXIS 92
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The maintenance of a harmonious body of decisional law is essential to the efficient administration of justice. Therefore, if the judicial system is to operate efficiently, this court must be bound by decisions of the Supreme Court.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sanders, Gardner, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-18· cited 145×
- Botehlo v. BycuraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-08-30· cited 48×
- Langley v. BoyterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-11-29· cited 45×
- Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-10-08· cited 38×
- Gasque v. Heublein, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-04-09· cited 33×
- McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-04-18· cited 30×
- Bain Ex Rel. Estate of Bain v. Self Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-03-12· cited 22×
- ML-Lee Acquisition Fund, L.P. v. Deloitte & ToucheCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-08-21· cited 18×
- Garrett v. SnedigarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-07-06· cited 16×
- Daniel v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-04-13· cited 13×
- M & T Chemicals, Inc. v. Barker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-27· cited 9×
- Reed v. MedlinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-07· cited 6×
- HIERS BY HIERS v. MullensCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-12-07· cited 5×
- Beckham v. ShortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-01-25· cited 4×
- Bowen v. U.S. Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-04-11· cited 4×
- Carrington v. THE CITY OF SPARTANBURGCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-10-08· cited 4×
- Johnston v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-05-15· cited 3×
- Brown v. County of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-14· cited 3×
- Duval Ex Rel. Estate of Duval v. Heritage Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-03· cited 2×
- Carolina Winds Owners' Ass'n v. Joe Harden Builder, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-11-30· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,062×
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-23· cited 419×
- Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-14· cited 385×
- Cauley v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-16· cited 72×
- Belue v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-01· cited 22×
- CALDWELL v. McMILLANSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1953-09-24· cited 17×
- Abrams v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-02-20· cited 16×
- Hazard v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-05-27· cited 12×
- Abernathy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-03-31· cited 11×
- Bennett v. BennettAppellate Court of Illinois· 1960-09-08· cited 9×
- McKenzie v. McKenzieSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-18· cited 7×
- Hanselmann v. McCardleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-03-14· cited 6×
- State Ex Rel. McLeod v. Fritz Waidner Sports Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-02-25· cited 5×
- Williams v. StrebSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-05-04· cited 5×
- Reed v. MedlinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-08-03· cited 4×
- Stalheim v. DoskocilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-08-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.