Shash v. Biogen Inc.

Oral argument

• Argued

  38 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a limit ing instruction which defined the terms “heinous, atrocious, or cruel” in equally vague language was not constitutionally sufficient
• holding that pursuant to a lawful arrest, law enforcement officials may seize personal effects and clothing from one who has been arrested
• finding that defendant waived the husband-wife privilege when he encouraged police to corroborate his story by questioning his wife
• finding that defendant waived the husband-wife privilege when he encouraged police to corroborate his story by questioning his wife
• finding that defendant waived the husband-wife privilege when he encouraged police to corroborate his story by questioning his wife
• holding unconstitutional a limiting construction of Mississippi’s heinousness factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).