Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 9/27/1978

Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand

Citations

  • 457 F. Supp. 879
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that considerations of tax consequences qualify as profit-seeking for the purpose of defining securities
  • “control” under Section 20(a) depends on whether defendant “had the power or potential power to influence and control the activities of’ controlled person
  • Coopers & Lybrand was held liable on the basis of respon-deat superior for a non-partner’s primary fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph S. Lord

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.