Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 8/10/1982

Shango v. Jurich

Citations

  • 681 F.2d 1091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that prison transfers are “the business of penologists and not the business of federal judges” (internal citations omitted)
  • emphasizing that prison transfers are “the business of penologists and not the business of federal judges” (internal citations omitted)
  • “[I]solated events that adversely affect individuals are not presumed to be a violation of the equal protection clause.”
  • “The gravamen of equal protection lies not in the fact of deprivation of a right but in the invidious classification of persons aggrieved by the state’s action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.