Jeffery Wansley v. MS Department of Corrections, e

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge regarding parole in Mississippi does not state a habeas corpus claim
• holding that when a prisoner “has no liberty interest in obtaining parole . . . he cannot complain of the constitutionality of procedural devices attendant to parole decisions”
• noting that state law cannot serve as \the source of ... process due\
• noting that state law cannot serve as \the source of ... process due\
• “Parole … is discretionary in Mississippi, so prisoners in the state have no liberty interest in parole.”
• no federal habeas relief based on Mississippi parole revocation proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).