Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 1/15/2013

Shabaj v. Holder

Citations

  • 718 F.3d 48
  • 2013 WL 1760540
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Second Circuit, not the district court, could possibly have jurisdiction under subsection (a)(2)(D
  • holding that, “while this [Circuit] court would have jurisdiction to review any constitutional claims or questions of law properly raised in a petition for review, the district court [does] not have jurisdiction”
  • observing that regardless of the federal question statute, “the judicial review provisions of the APA do not apply ‘to the extent that . . . statutes preclude judicial review’”
  • noting that the district court lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim because the language in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) requires that the claim be raised “upon a petition for review filed with an appropriate court of appeals.” (emphasis in original)
  • finding the court lacked jurisdiction to review denial of an inadmissibility waiver under §§ 1182(i)(2) and 1252(a)(2)(B)
  • finding that the APA challenge to USCIS’s denial of his application for a waiver of admissibility was barred by judicial review because “the judicial review provisions of the APA do not apply ‘to the extent that . . . statutes preclude judicial review.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gleeson, Katzmann, Kearse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Shabaj v. Holder

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.