District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/12/2010
S.G. v. State
Citations
- 26 So. 3d 725
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1431
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The court is required to discuss the restrictiveness level vis-à-vis the needs of the child.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larose, Northcutt, Villanti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- J.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-14· cited 4×
- T.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-03· cited 3×
- A v. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-12
- R.B., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-04-29
- R.C.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-09
- T. S. v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-02-18
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.