J.H. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the disposition order because “[t]he trial court did not explain adequately how a high-risk level of restrictiveness would better fit [the juvenile’s] rehabilitative needs and public safety than a moderate-risk level of restrictiveness”
• “[T]he ‘needs of the child’ must be the focal point for the court when it is assessing where along the restrictiveness spectrum a child should be placed.” (alteration in original) (quoting N.P. v. State, 18 So. 3d 735, 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• R.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-12· cited 3×
• A v. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-12
• R.B., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-04-29

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• E.A.R. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 141×
• A.J.V. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-23· cited 22×
• M.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10· cited 13×
• N.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-16· cited 8×
• S.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-12· cited 8×