Indiana Court of Appeals· 5/26/1992
Sewell v. State
Citations
- 592 N.E.2d 705
- 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 863
- 1992 WL 108210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that fundamental fairness may require postconviction DNA testing in appropriate case
- noting that fundamental fairness may require postconviction DNA testing in appropriate case
- noting, in deciding petitioner's right to discovery of rape kit for purpose of obtaining DNA analysis, that \[a]dvances in technology may yield potential for exculpation where none previously existed.\
- noting, in deciding petitioner‟s right to discovery of rape kit for purpose of obtaining DNA analysis, that “[a]dvances in technology may yield potential for exculpation where none previously existed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Staton, Garrard, Conover
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. El-TabechNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-05-19· cited 80×
- Bunch v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-21· cited 50×
- Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-05-04· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-01· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. BrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-10· cited 24×
- David Pannell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-05-28· cited 23×
- Riofta v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-22· cited 22×
- State v. RioftaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-22· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-26· cited 12×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-06-27· cited 12×
- James E. Hinkle v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2018-03-26· cited 10×
- Hamilton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-08-11· cited 2×
- Osborne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2005-04-15· cited 1×
- Kristine Bunch v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-21
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-11-01· cited 68×
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 53×
- Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-10-29· cited 41×
- State v. ThomasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-01-16· cited 27×
- Dabbs v. VergariNew York Supreme Court· 1990-11-21· cited 27×
- People v. CallaceNew York County Courts· 1991-06-27· cited 16×
- Sturgill v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-09-29· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Grammer v. Tippecanoe Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-07-11· cited 12×
- Mickens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-10-07· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.