Skip to main content

Sewell v. State

Citations

  • 592 N.E.2d 705
  • 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 863
  • 1992 WL 108210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that fundamental fairness may require postconviction DNA testing in appropriate case
  • noting that fundamental fairness may require postconviction DNA testing in appropriate case
  • noting, in deciding petitioner's right to discovery of rape kit for purpose of obtaining DNA analysis, that \[a]dvances in technology may yield potential for exculpation where none previously existed.\
  • noting, in deciding petitioner‟s right to discovery of rape kit for purpose of obtaining DNA analysis, that “[a]dvances in technology may yield potential for exculpation where none previously existed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Garrard, Conover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.