Connecticut Appellate Court· 4/22/2003
Sevigny v. Dibble Hollow Condominium Ass'n
Citations
- 76 Conn. App. 306
- 819 A.2d 844
- 2003 Conn. App. LEXIS 178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the undertaking of maintenance by a condominium association “is consistent with the traditional landlord-tenant relationship”
- concluding, along with courts of other states, that condominium association, similar to landlord-duty relationship, has duty of reasonable care toward unit owners 10 and their guests with respect to their use of common areas controlled by association
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ritter & Ritter, Inc. Pension & Profit Plan v. the Churchill Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal· 2008-07-22· cited 39×
- Grignano v. City of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-01· cited 23×
- Turner v. American Car Rental, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-10-25· cited 19×
- Macias v. Summit ManagementCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-21· cited 16×
- Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-31· cited 14×
- Rubel v. WainwrightConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-01-04· cited 14×
- Demarkey v. FratturoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-12-30· cited 13×
- S. A. v. D. G.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-06-16· cited 9×
- Forrestt v. KochConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-06-22· cited 7×
- Beckenstein v. Reid and Riege, PCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-03-31· cited 6×
- Twin Oaks Condominium Ass'n v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-11-01· cited 6×
- Cameron Crogan v. Pine Bluff EstatesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-06-11· cited 4×
- Blatchley v. MintzConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-03-09· cited 4×
- Atkin v. MarkoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-06-08· cited 3×
- Willis v. Twin Shores Master Owner Association, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2025-04-03· cited 2×
- Donna Denton v. John HahnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-09-16
- Sola v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-09-16
- Daoud Mousa Janini v. London Townhouses Condominium AssociationMichigan Supreme Court· 2024-07-11
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-04-11· cited 355×
- Jaworski v. KiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-06-17· cited 140×
- O'CONNOR v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court· 1983-05-09· cited 122×
- Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-04· cited 106×
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-20· cited 66×
- Martinez v. Woodmar IV Condominiums Homeowners Ass'nArizona Supreme Court· 1997-06-24· cited 55×
- White v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-05-24· cited 55×
- Corcoran v. JacovinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-07-09· cited 52×
- Kurti v. BeckerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-08-03· cited 49×
- Goodmaster v. HouserSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-01· cited 40×
- Warren v. StancliffSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-11-26· cited 37×
- Scanlon v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-16· cited 34×
- Coville v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-04-11· cited 21×
- Sacker v. Perry Realty Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-03-31· cited 19×
- Emerick v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court· 1999-11-15· cited 15×
- Macy v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-09-03· cited 13×
- Hernandez v. CirmoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-01-08· cited 10×
- Pratt v. Maryland Farms Condominium Phase 1, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-06-08· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.