Blatchley v. Mintz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that res ipsa loquitur was not applicable because the plaintiff could not present a single circumstance showing how or by what agency his injury occurred
• holding that res ipsa loquitur was not applicable because the plaintiff could not present a single circumstance showing how or by what agency his injury occurred
• operator of “mimic railroad” held to ordinary standard of care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).