Skip to main content

Serna v. State

Citations

  • 707 S.E.2d 904
  • 308 Ga. App. 518
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 870
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding conviction where indictment charged defendant with possessing a “dangerous drug” known as “amyl nitrate,” which was not included on applicable statute’s list of dangerous drugs, where defendant admitted to possessing “alkyl nitrite,” which was listed in the statute
  • upholding conviction where indictment charged defendant with possessing a “dangerous drug” known as “amyl nitrate,” which was not included on applicable statute’s list of dangerous drugs, where defendant admitted to possessing “alkyl nitrite,” which was listed in the statute
  • evidence supported inference that defendant knew that the chemical compound in the drug to sedate his sexual battery victim was classified as a dangerous drug under the Dangerous Drug Act, OCGA § 16-13-70
  • evidence supported inference that defendant knew that the chemical compound in the drug to sedate his sexual battery victim was classified as a dangerous drug under the Dangerous Drug Act, OCGA § 16-13-70

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doyle, Ellington, Andrews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.