Mincey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A defendant’s ignorance of the fact that he was violating the law does not relieve him of criminal intent if he intended to do the act that the legislature prohibited. Criminal intention may be found from the circumstances connected with the act for which the accused is prosecuted”
• “A defendant’s ignorance of the fact that he was violating the law does not relieve him of criminal intent if he intended to do the act that the legislature prohibited. Criminal intention may be found from the circumstances connected with the act for which the accused is prosecuted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-10-30· cited 10×
• Serna v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-17· cited 9×
• Duvall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-07-19· cited 8×
• Johnny Eugene Harris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-10-30
• Maria Terrell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-02-20

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hameen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-11-01· cited 5×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1938-04-26· cited 5×