Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Washington Supreme Court· 7/31/2014

SentinelC3, Inc. v. Hunt

Citations

  • 181 Wash. 2d 127
  • 331 P.3d 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hearsay and unsworn statements would not allow reasonable minds to find for the nonmoving party
  • explaining that lay opinions based solely on consultations with experts whose reports are not 9 No. 83404-5-I/10 authenticated cannot be considered on summary judgment
  • explaining that lay opinions based solely on consultations with experts whose reports are not authenticated cannot be considered on summary judgment
  • explaining that lay opinions based solely on consultations with experts whose reports are not authenticated cannot be considered on summary judgment
  • rejecting admission of expert witnesses’ valuation opinion put into evidence through party’s testimony because the valuations “were based entirely on a consulting expert’s valuation that ‘constituted hearsay’ ” (quoting SentinelC3, Inc. v. Hunt, 176 Wn.2d 152, 162, 309 P.3d 582 (2013))
  • “In determining an award of attorney’s fees, the trial court may not rely solely on counsel’s fee affidavit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCloud

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named SentinelC3, Inc. v. Hunt

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.