Skip to main content
D. Minnesota· 3/3/2009

Semler v. Klang

Citations

  • 603 F. Supp. 2d 1211
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16602
  • 2009 WL 537641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying plaintiff’s motion for default judgment where defendant timely filed motion to dismiss in lieu of an answer
  • finding no basis to conclude that an attorney was impliedly authorized to accept service of process, particularly because the attorney “specifically attest[ed] that he is not authorized to accept service of process on behalf of” the defendant
  • “If the defendant brings a facial challenge . . . the Court reviews the pleadings alone . . . .”
  • \If the defendant brings a facial challenge ... the Court reviews the pleadings alone ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joan N. Ericksen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.