Linda McCormick v. Eric A. Braverman Citizens Insurance Company of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rooker-Feldman did not bar allegations that the defendants committed an abuse of process in the divorce proceedings
• holding that, while Rooker- Feldman barred some claims, the remainder were “independent” claims over which the court had jurisdiction
• holding that Rooker-Feldman does not bar a claim that a state court’s order was “based on fraud and misrepresentation”
• concluding that Rooker-Feldman barred a plaintiff from complaining that a state- court order was issued “absent any jurisdiction” and that the order “itself” caused harm
• holding that Rooker-Feldman did not apply to a plaintiff’s claims that the defendants acted fraudulently and illegally during a state divorce proceeding
• holding that a claim that a party engaged in fraud and misrepresentation in a state-court proceeding was independent of an injury caused by the state-court judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).