Ninth Circuit· 5/23/1980
Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald
Citations
- 619 F.2d 801
- 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 17276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the statute and order in Healing used different language in a different legislative setting than the 1934 Act.”
- after Hopi interests are identified, Navajo interests are residue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Skopil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- King v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 74×
- Navajo Nation v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2011-01-10· cited 45×
- Hopi Tribe v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2002-12-27· cited 33×
- SEKAQUAPTEWA v. MacDONALDNinth Circuit· 1980-08-21· cited 11×
- Manybeads v. United StatesD. Arizona· 1989-10-20· cited 8×
- SEKAQUAPTEWA v. MacDONALDNinth Circuit· 1980-05-23· cited 6×
- Masayesva v. ZahD. Arizona· 1992-12-21· cited 4×
- MASAYESVA FOR HOPI INDIAN TRIBE v. ZahD. Arizona· 1992-06-18· cited 3×
- Masayesva v. ZahD. Arizona· 1992-03-13· cited 3×
- Masayesva v. ZahD. Arizona· 1992-03-11· cited 3×
- Masayesva v. ZahD. Arizona· 1992-07-10· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1983-10-25
- Taylor v. BradleyNavajo Nation Supreme Court· 1989-08-31
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 878×
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-01-14· cited 693×
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court· 1975-04-21· cited 449×
- United States v. SandovalSupreme Court· 1913-10-20· cited 287×
- Mattz v. ArnettSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 282×
- Seymour v. Superintendent of Washington State PenitentiarySupreme Court· 1962-01-15· cited 277×
- Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax CommissionSupreme Court· 1965-04-29· cited 262×
- Leavenworth, Lawrence, & Galveston Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1876-04-10· cited 258×
- Hynes, Regional Director, Fish & Wildlife Service v. Grimes Packing Co.Supreme Court· 1949-05-31· cited 152×
- Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-03-14· cited 151×
- Bailey v. DixonSupreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 128×
- Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. HollowbreastSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 101×
- Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe v. Healing, Chairman of Hopi Council of Hopi Indian TribeSupreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 75×
- Healing v. JonesD. Arizona· 1962-09-28· cited 70×
- United States v. Walker River Irr. Dist.Ninth Circuit· 1939-06-05· cited 55×
- Hamilton v. NakaiNinth Circuit· 1972-01-18· cited 42×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1971-12-12· cited 41×
- Abbott Sekaquaptewa, Etc. v. Peter MacDonald Etc., Griffin B. Bell, Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1978-05-15· cited 39×
- Healing v. JonesD. Arizona· 1959-05-25· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.