Illinois Supreme Court· 4/23/1909
Seith v. Commonwealth Electric Co.
Citations
- 241 Ill. 252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, to be foreseeable to the first wrongdoer, the “precise form of the injury” does not need to be foreseen; rather “when it occurs it must appear that it was a natural and probable consequence of his negligence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cartwright, Vickers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1942-11-17· cited 369×
- Harrison v. Hardin County Community Unit School District No. 1Illinois Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 137×
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1957-11-14· cited 112×
- Boylan v. MartindaleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-01-22· cited 74×
- Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court· 1921-09-09· cited 69×
- Hillyard v. Utah By-Products Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1953-11-12· cited 63×
- Grigsby & Co. v. BrattonTennessee Supreme Court· 1913-12-15· cited 54×
- Phillabaum v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1924-12-16· cited 52×
- Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. CornumArizona Supreme Court· 1937-01-04· cited 45×
- Staff v. Montana Petroleum Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1930-07-19· cited 39×
- Campion v. Chicago Landscape Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1938-05-03· cited 34×
- Stewart v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1951-01-10· cited 33×
- Johnson v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1943-04-28· cited 33×
- Denniston v. Skelly Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-04-13· cited 31×
- Waschow v. Kelly Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1910-06-29· cited 30×
- Holtz v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1951-04-12· cited 29×
- Daneschocky v. SiebleMissouri Court of Appeals· 1917-03-05· cited 29×
- Sycamore Preserve Works v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1937-02-12· cited 28×
- Curran v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1919-06-18· cited 27×
- Wawryszyn v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois· 1956-06-19· cited 26×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court· 1877-04-30· cited 880×
- Village of Carterville v. CookIllinois Supreme Court· 1889-06-17· cited 67×
- True & True Co. v. WodaIllinois Supreme Court· 1903-02-18· cited 36×
- Cuneo v. O'ConnorIllinois Supreme Court· 1904-06-23· cited 27×
- Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. TrckaIllinois Supreme Court· 1905-12-20· cited 27×
- American Express Co. v. RisleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1899-04-17· cited 25×
- Chicago Hair & Bristle Co. v. MuellerIllinois Supreme Court· 1908-06-16· cited 23×
- L. Wolff Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 14×
- Hullinger v. WorrellIllinois Supreme Court· 1876-09-15· cited 12×
- Smith v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1905-05-08· cited 8×
- City of Kansas City v. GilbertSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-10-11· cited 8×
Other cases named Seith v. Commonwealth Electric Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.