Boylan v. Martindale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing considerations of public policy in rejecting imposition of duty based on placement of utility pole
• discussing considerations of public policy in rejecting imposition of duty based on placement of utility pole
• in which the appellate court concluded, in part, that the plaintiff’s complaint had failed to allege that (1) the particular utility pole previously had been struck by vehicles, or (2
• in which the appellate court concluded, in part, that the plaintiff's complaint had failed to allege that (1) the particular utility pole previously had been struck by vehicles, or (2
• in which the appellate court concluded, in part, that the plaintiff's complaint had failed to allege that (1) the particular utility pole previously had been struck by vehicles, or (2
• as a matter of law, the defendant could not have reasonably foreseen the intervening cause and subsequent injury as a natural and probable result of its alleged negligent failure to keep the areas adjacent to the intersection free of trees and bushes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).