Seinfeld v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff must present some evidence to establish a credible basis for the Court of Chancery to infer possible wrongdoing
• holding that a Section 220 plaintiff need only allege a “‘credible basis’ from which a court can infer that mismanagement, waste or wrongdoing may have occurred” (emphasis added)
• holding that a Section 220 plaintiff need only allege a “‘credible basis’ from which a court can infer that mismanagement, waste or wrongdoing may have occurred” (emphasis added)
• holding that a Section 220 plaintiff need only allege a “‘credible basis’ from which a court can infer that mismanagement, waste or wrongdoing may have occurred” (emphasis added)
• explaining that to satisfy the credible basis standard the stockholder must present “some evidence” of wrongdoing
• explaining that to satisfy the credible basis standard the stockholder must present “some evidence” of wrongdoing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).