Seewagen v. Vanderkluet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to determine whether appellants should have discovered the defect or had exercised reasonable care are questions of fact
• standard of review of denial of a request for a judgment n.o.v. is to decide if there is competent evidence to sustain the verdict giving the verdict winner the benefit of every reasonable inference
• reasonableness of inspection and degree of risk presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).