Berman v. Radnor Rolls, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiff’s prima facie case requires proof of duty that involves an objective and subjective standard
• discussing the conceptual differences between the \no-duty\ rule and the defense of assumption of the risk
• discussing the conceptual differences between the “no-duty” rule and the defense of assumption of the risk
• holding failure to raise argument results in waiver
• discusses concepts of “no duty” and the assumption of the risk defense
• “It is true that defendants have no duty to protect roller skaters against the typical risks of roller skating, such as falling down or being bumped by other skaters. These are risks general to skating at any rink.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).