Seelbach v. Clubb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence legally sufficient to support finding that Henry’s survey was the proper legal description of a certain tract because he had used the oldest survey that he could find and had followed in the footsteps of the original survey when making his own survey
• applying factors for tortious interference with a contract and noting defense of justification/privilege
• language in contract stating seller “agrees to sell” and buyer “agrees to buy” is not language of contract of sale but agreement to sell in future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).