Skip to main content
First Circuit· 3/10/2010

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tambone

Citations

  • 597 F.3d 436
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5031
  • 2010 WL 796996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that arguments made before a district court, but not pursued on appeal, are deemed abandoned
  • noting that in public enforcement actions under Rule 10b-5, as opposed to private civil enforcement actions, the government need not prove reliance
  • stating that “[o]ne reference point for determining the ordinary meaning of a word is its accepted dictionary RIVERA-MOLINA V. CASA LA ROCA, LLC Page 11 definition” and relying on Black’s Law Dictionary and Webster’s Third New International Dictionary
  • discussing the meaning of the word \make\ as used in 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5(b)
  • explaining claims of fraud “must set out the ‘time, place, and content of the alleged misrepresentation with specificity’” (quoting Greebel v. FTP Software, Inc., 194 F.3d 185, 193 (1st Cir. 1999)). Rule 9(b
  • stating that “[w]ord choices have consequences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Lipez, Lynch, Selya, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

269 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tambone

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.