Schatz v. Republican State Leadership Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when handling a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, courts must “isolate and ignore statements in the complaint that simply offer legal labels and conclusions or merely rehash cause-of-action elements.”
• noting that the court may consider, on a motion to dismiss, documents attached to or incorporated into the complaint
• concluding that courts may only consider complaint’s non- conclusory and non-speculative facts
• stating that a court may “isolate and ignore statements in the complaint that simply offer legal labels and conclusions or merely rehash cause-of-action elements”
• stating that a court may “isolate and ignore statements in the complaint that simply offer legal labels and conclusions or merely rehash cause-of-action elements”
• stating that a court may “isolate and ignore statements in the complaint that simply offer legal labels and conclusions or merely rehash cause-of-action elements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).