Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hasho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that telephone sales calls to securities customers were sufficient to implicate the prohibition of Section 5(a)(1)
• “Prejudgment interest on damages pursuant to a violation of the federal securities laws is a matter of judicial discretion.”
• “Unauthorized trades are illegal when accompanied [by] deception, misrepresentation or non-disclosure . . . .” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Those who hold themselves out as professionals with specialized knowledge and skill to furnish guidance cannot be heard to claim youth or inexperience when faced with charges of violations of the antifraud provisions of the securities laws.”
• Forms 211 and press releases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).