Securities & Exchange Commission v. Happ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding costs under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c)(2) where SEC refused to admit that it did not call defendant on June 25, 1998 from an office telephone and defendant later proved this to be true
• “Precedent requires a ‘reasonable likelihood’ of future violations, although it is not necessary to show an ‘imminent threat.’” (quoting Sargent, 329 F.3d at 39)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).