Skip to main content
· 5/15/1984

Evelyn ZERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George BALL, Robert Fomon, and E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 735 F.2d 15
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the state specified in a choice-of-law clause “had a reasonable relationship” to a loan transaction in part because the “loan was payable” there and because of the choice-of-law clause itself
  • dismissing the claims as to individual defendants where the complaint did not assert that either made any statement to the plaintiff or had contact with her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansfield, Kearse, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.