Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/27/2024

SEC v. Jarkesy

Citations

  • 603 U.S. 109

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, when an agency seeks to impose substantial penalties, due process requires a jury trial
  • holding that, when the SEC seeks penalties, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial
  • holding that, when an agency’s civil-enforcement action resembles a common-law cause of action and the “public rights” exception to Article III 11 jurisdiction does not apply, the Seventh Amendment guarantees a jury- trial right
  • noting that the statutory fraud prohibition and common law fraud “target the same basic conduct”
  • holding, post-Seila Law, that the Seventh Amendment does not permit the SEC to compel individuals to defend against civil-penalty actions in administrative proceedings, rather than before juries in federal court
  • explaining that matters that are “quintessentially suits at common law” cannot be core matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John G. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.