Supreme Court· 6/27/2024
SEC v. Jarkesy
Citations
- 603 U.S. 109
Oral argument
- ListenArgued117 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, when an agency seeks to impose substantial penalties, due process requires a jury trial
- holding that, when the SEC seeks penalties, the Seventh Amendment entitles the defendant to a jury trial
- holding that, when an agency’s civil-enforcement action resembles a common-law cause of action and the “public rights” exception to Article III 11 jurisdiction does not apply, the Seventh Amendment guarantees a jury- trial right
- noting that the statutory fraud prohibition and common law fraud “target the same basic conduct”
- holding, post-Seila Law, that the Seventh Amendment does not permit the SEC to compel individuals to defend against civil-penalty actions in administrative proceedings, rather than before juries in federal court
- explaining that matters that are “quintessentially suits at common law” cannot be core matters
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John G. Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Porter v. Hammond N. Condominium Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-25· cited 4×
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Equity Services, LLCFirst Circuit· 2025-04-01· cited 2×
- Ball v. New York State Dept. of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2026-04-23· cited 1×
- Rodney Shands v. City of MarathonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-05
- Vape Central Group, LLC v. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2025-02-27
- Louie Joseph Aquilino and Robin Aquilino v.Third Circuit· 2025-04-24
- Gary Perez and Matilde Torres v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court· 2025-06-13
- Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. NoemDistrict of Columbia· 2025-07-02
- Axalta Coating Systems LLC v. FAAThird Circuit· 2025-07-15
- Sun Valley Orchards LLC v. United States Department of LaborThird Circuit· 2025-07-29
- Alin Pop v. LuliFama.com LLCEleventh Circuit· 2025-08-01
- Sprint Corporation v. FCCD.C. Circuit· 2025-08-15
- AT&T v. FCCFifth Circuit· 2025-08-22
- Butler Amusements, Inc. v. U.S. Department of LaborDistrict of Columbia· 2025-08-26
- Rebecca Slaughter v. Donald TrumpD.C. Circuit· 2025-09-02
- Moats v. Natl Crdt Un Admin BdFifth Circuit· 2025-09-23
- National Labor Relations Board v. North Mountain Foothills Apartments, LLCNinth Circuit· 2025-10-28
- Daley v. ChoateTenth Circuit· 2025-11-03
- NLRB v. Starbucks Corp.Sixth Circuit· 2025-11-05
- Blue Beach Bungalows DE, LLC v. The Delaware Department of Justice Consumer Protection UnitSupreme Court of Delaware· 2025-12-30
Cites
93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court· 2019-04-01· cited 12,652×
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 3,086×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 2,206×
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1821-03-18· cited 2,076×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1937-04-12· cited 2,059×
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 1,908×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,818×
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 1,582×
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 1,574×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.